There is another example of God's people receiving spoils of war, long after Abraham, from which only one five hundredth and one fiftieth were given as "offerings" to the priests and minister.
The Tithe (Part 1)
CTM

The "tithe" is a subject that is doctrinally central to many institutional “church” organization leaders. Those denominations that can get their members to actually bring in a full 10% of gross income can create very powerful forces far beyond their strength in numbers. The top "tithing" sects, according to an article published some years ago in Christian Ministry, are interestingly what Evangelicals would term "cults." The Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and the World Wide Church of God were the leading givers. The fourth is the Assemblies of God. According to Newsweek at that time, most church members give far less than 10%, with most giving under 2%. Not surprising is the fact that the poor give a higher percentage of their income than the “rich.” USA Today wrote that families earning less than $10,000 gave 5.5% of their income to charity (not necessarily to “churches”). Families earning between $50,000 and $60,000 gave only 1.7% of their earnings.

In this article, we will see that, while many "church" fund-raising organizations, Christian financial counseling ministries, radio and television ministries, et al, tell us that not paying the tithe is robbing God, the reality is that those who put the tithe upon Christians are, in fact, the ones who are doing the robbing based upon a false theology. Not one example can be produced, from scripture, of the early Church lavishing back upon themselves their own giving through tithing in support of buildings and programs that benefit the giver. Even more difficult is the idea of the Old Testament "tithe" directly benefitting a man-made organization. A parellel simply does not exist anywhere within the biblical texts. None of this is intended to convey the idea that a group does not have the right to have a building in common, where they can gather for praise, teaching, and other activities. However, pouring the primary portion of one's giving (with the idea of the giving being synonymous with giving to God) into an institution that absorbs most of what is given into its own expenditures and luxuries, does create theological/doctrinal problems that cannot be so easily denied by anyone who looks upon such things in accordance with Paul's instruction to "prove all things." As we go through this article, keep in mind the above statistic that the poor far out-give the rich.

The tithe has been introduced to the Body of Christ using 3 main tactics.

1) Sowing guilt and shame into the Body of Christ by quoting verses like Malachi 3:8 (What devoted Christian wants to rob God? The net effect of sowing guilt has been to extort money from the Body of Christ, thereby robbing the Body of the joy and blessing of giving as God leads. This tactic ignores Paul’s instructions to the church in 2 Corinthians 9:7.)

2) Blaming the "laity" for the financial troubles in the Body of Christ by telling the Body they are not blessed by God because they do not tithe while pointing at Malachi 3:10. (In so doing, believers are challenged to tithe, with the promise that God will bless them (not if, but) when they do. Such giving is not out of love for God, but out of selfishness. It implies a reward for works, which contradicts Ephesians 2:8-9.)

3) Another equally successful tactic involves placing upon the mind and heart of the hearer positive affirmation rather than guilt, but such misapplication of scripture does not always work out to the benefit of the giver. (Positive affirmations almost always ignore the harsh reality of life in a fallen world, thereby infusing into the thinking of many that seemingly good works always call down God's blessing because of the promises given to the nation Israel. This, of course, is a false hope, not because God does not bless, but because we were told long ago that we will suffer in this world because of our testimony of Christ Jesus.

As a result of these points, we can come to a couple of valid conclusions:

  1. The Apostles did not teach the Gentiles to tithe. Acts 15:1-31 records a dispute over circumcision that arose in the Gentile church at Antioch. Several false brothers had attempted to require Gentile (non-Jewish) Christians to be circumcised. Paul and Barnabas sharply opposed the false brothers and traveled to Jerusalem to discuss the issue of circumcision with the other apostles. In Jerusalem, they reported the miracles and conversions among the Gentiles. The apostles were filled with joy over God’s work there, and they agreed that circumcision was not a requirement for salvation. Following the meeting, the apostles and elders in the church at Jerusalem sent Paul and Barnabas back to Antioch with a letter of welcome to the Gentile Christians. The essential text of the letter is found in Acts 15:28-29. It reads: "It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things. Farewell." The apostles did not want to burden the Gentiles with Old Testament practices and/or principles that not even Moses himself followed! The proof is in their letter to the Gentiles and the fact that the apostles did not impose the tithe upon them.

  2. Let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that Jesus had commanded us to continue tithing. It would be appropriate, then, to use the tithe to feed the priesthood as originally purposed. Who then is the priesthood? Peter wrote in 1 Peter 2:5 and 9 that every believer is a priest! Hebrews 5-8 also teaches us that Jesus is the only priest that we need. However, the institutional "church" has borrowed from the Old Testament model of the Levitical Priesthood, thereby establishing a new priesthood (ordained clergy) that is separate from the rest of the Body of Christ. The division between the clergy and the so-called "laity" is not Biblical. (Is this the doctrine of the Nicolaitan’s that Jesus says He hates in Revelation 2:6? Jesus did not establish the ordained clergy – He chose fishermen and tax collectors to preach His gospel. Neither did He establish division in His church, He desires unity (John 17:20-23). The apostles did not set up an ordained clergy – they chose men full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom to serve the Body ( Acts 6:3, 1 Timothy 3). This man-made division between "clergy" and "laity" has effectively served to divert the offerings of the Body of Christ away from the people it is intended to bless and the offerings are most often used in ways contrary to the will of God. The net result has been starvation and financial bondage for many believers, and the real priesthood – the whole Body of Christ – has not been prepared to carry out Christ’s command to preach the gospel to all nations! The early Church had a much better understanding of Christ’s intent to care for the needs of the Body of Christ than we do today. The proof of their caring for each other can be seen in Acts 2:44-47 and Acts 4:32-37, where the Body of Christ shared everything, and through their giving, they eliminated poverty and indebtedness. In fact, Acts 4:34 says "there were no needy persons among them!" Taking up offerings to feed the Body of Christ was common in the early church. In Acts 11:27-30, the Gentile church at Antioch took up an offering for the believers in Judea who were experiencing a time of famine. Can you imagine a church today taking up an offering for a cross-town rival?

This may shock many Christians who have been in “church” for a long period of time, and feel they know the Bible pretty well, but it is hoped that the following statement encourages the reader to "see for themselves" that it is 100% Biblically true. The tithe, as taught by most Christian denominations as being 10% of gross or net income, is not contained anywhere whithin the pages of the Bible! Many Christian publications say that those who do not tithe are robbing God and will suffer curses for not doing so. We will use one of them as an example of what Scriptures and reasoning is usually used to support the idea that the “church” is full of God-robber's; that is, people who do not tithe ten percent of their income. A booklet entitled Tithes, Offering, and Alms states:

  • "Today, many churches do not teach tithing because they do not want to drive people away. In reality, they are robbing God's people of their blessing. When tithing is not taught, they are allowing their people to ignorantly rob God. By this they allow the devourer to have free access to their people. Then the church and the people wonder why they are not being blessed. When God's people return again unto God, He will return unto them as He has promised."

(We will not mention the author of this work. Perhaps, in the future, he will see the foolishness of what he wrote. Therefore, we will withhold his name, hoping repentance is forthcoming.)

In one small paragraph, this man condemned entire congregations who do not tithe to the devourer. As long as people do not tithe, he says, they have turned their backs to God, and He cannot bless them. They are God-robbers! This booklet is very typical of publications like this. They all refer to the same handful of Scriptures to justify their position. We will use this one as an example of which Scriptures are used to support their view, and then show how these Scriptures have not only been grossly taken out of context, but even these Scriptures out of context do not support the teaching of tithing being 10% of income. We will then study the history of tithing in the Old Testament, the early church view on the subject, and what we believe is the correct Biblical view on giving.

While the booklet "Tithes, Offerings, and Alms" deals with more than just the tithe, we will only focus on the tithe since that is the subject at hand. Those who teach that Christians are obligated to tithe can be categorized into two main groups; 1) those who say we are still under the Mosaic, Law or portions of it; and 2) those who say the tithe is a "principle," based upon its allegedly being a part of the Abrahamic Covenant, which is pre-Mosaic. The idea is that the Abrahamic Covenant is the covenant of faith, which is still binding upon believers, and, therefore, the tithe is still in effect for Christians as a “principle for giving.”

Let us deal first with the pre-Mosaic tithe fallacy. This teaching is used by ministries who have taught that the Mosaic Law was done away with, and therefore cannot be put upon Christians. They are correct in this view. We cannot get into this subject fully because it would take up too much space, but a handful of Scriptures might be helpful to those who disagree on this point. (See 2 Cor. 3:11,13; Hebrews 8:13; Gal. 4:21-26; more fully, all of Galatians and Hebrews.)

Briefly, the Old Covenant was a two-sided agreement between Israel and Yahweh, where Yahweh would bless them (as a nation) if they kept their part of the agreement, and He would curse them (as a nation) if they did not. It was an all or nothing package. A person was not allowed to turn this agreement into a smorgasbord, picking and choosing what suited one's religious tastes. They could not choose what to keep and what to throw out. James 2:10 tells us that "whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all."

Historically, almost all denominations of Christianity have taken portions of the Mosaic Covenant, christened them, and added them to the New Covenant. Without being aware of it, this has made most Christians guilty of the whole Mosaic Law (which says all must be kept) while at the same time rejecting grace because of mixing it with a covenant that no longer served a purpose for those under the New Covenant. The fact that most denominations of Christendom have not understood this vital point has caused us to unknowingly reject "grace through faith," the very power of the New Covenant itself. What is tragic is that most Christians are not even aware of this "falling away," which has been going on for hundreds of years. Most denominations have mixed the Mosaic Covenant instituted by Moses with the New Covenant, which is the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. (Rom. 8:2) One covenant brought death (and always will), the other brought Life. If you believe any of the Old Covenant is binding to a believer in Christ, read what Paul has to say in 1 Corinthians Chapter three, verses four through eighteen, about the cornerstone of the Mosaic Covenant, that is, the Ten Commandments. This should cure anyone of binding themselves to the "ministry of death." The consequences of this mixture have been catastrophic. A careful, non-biased survey of church history from a non-Christian bias should reveal what this mixture has caused. While this paper is not about Mosaic Law versus Grace, the subject had to be touched upon somewhat.

Before we continue, however, let us review some valid points. Burdening the Body of Christ with the tithe requires twists and reinterpretations of scripture, some of which can include:

1) The tithe must be imported from the OT law of Moses to the new covenant of grace by Christ’s blood, which is an evil mixture no man can perpetrate without creating grave problems within the framework of his own theology.
2) The tithe must be redefined from "flocks, herds, fruit and grain" to "money" and often "time".
3) The storehouse must be translocated from the temple in Jerusalem to the local "church" building, which is mostly ludecrous since we all know that most do not store up anything for hard times, or for the needy.
4) The Body of Christ must buy into the ordained "clergy" class as the "new priesthood," thereby having replaced the Levitical priesthood as the rightful recipient of the tithe.
5) The Body of Christ must forfeit their own priesthood, and therefore buy into the notion that they are the weak "laity," stuck in the vortex of "perpetual sheepdom".
6) Those who believe the tithe to be a "spiritual principle" on account of it predating the Law (as allegedly exemplified in the lives of people like Abel, Abraham, Jacob, et al) do not realize they are portraying a system of inconsistent interpretation.

Part 2 of The Tithe

Please feel free to send feedback concerning this article. Also, please include the title of this article in your feedback. Thank you for visiting Central Truth Ministries.